<1>
Perris Valley Airport, Perris, CA
Location :
History :
Perris Valley Airport Today:
Airport
Services and Amenities:
Special Events:
Airport Area Accident History:
Accident occurred Thursday, January 10, 2008 in
Perris, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 7/30/2008
Aircraft: Corsario MK-5, registration: N9639H
Injuries: 1 Fatal.
The experimental amateur built amphibian airplane
impacted hilly terrain within a sparsely populated
area during daytime
visual meteorological conditions . The
wreckage site was near a lake and on scene
documentation by the
Federal Aviation Administration inspector
indicated that the airplane was maneuvering at low
level within sight of the lake shore when the left
wing contacted terrain, followed by the fuselage. No
radio transmissions were received by the pilot nor
were there any witnesses to the accident sequence. A
post accident examination of the airframe and engine
revealed no anomalies that would have suggested
mechanical malfunction or failure. After the initial
on-scene examinations by the Federal Aviation
Administration inspector, the wreckage recovery was
delayed due to weather. Once access to the site was
obtained, the recovery crew indicated that the
majority of the wreckage had been removed and its
disposition is unknown.
The National Transportation Safety Board
determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as
follows:
The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from
terrain while maneuvering.
= = =
Accident occurred Wednesday, September 19, 2007 in
Perris, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 1/31/2008
Aircraft: St. Claire Ragtop-01, registration: N3134Q
Injuries: 2 Serious.
The airplane impacted a fence during an aborted
landing and the airplane nosed into the ground.
During the landing, the pilot noticed that the hand
brake was not working. Approximately midfield, the
pilot applied full power to abort the landing. A
tractor was parked near the end of the runway and
the pilot turned the airplane to the left in order
to avoid it. During this turn, the left wheel
impacted a chain link fence and the airplane
impacted the ground. Due to damage sustained to the
airplane, the source of the brake malfunction was
not determined.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The pilot's failure to maintain control of the
airplane during an aborted landing. Contributing
factors to the accident were the fence and the
undetermined brake malfunction.
= = =
Accident occurred Monday, April 30, 2007 in Perris,
CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 7/25/2007
Aircraft: Cessna 177RG, registration: N177R
Injuries: 1 Minor.
The aircraft collided with trees during a forced
landing following a loss of engine power.
Approximately 12 nautical miles into the flight, the
engine abruptly lost power. The pilot decided that
he would attempt to land at a nearby airport but did
not have sufficient altitude and the airplane landed
2.51 nautical miles short of the runway. During the
engine examination, investigators noted that the cap
and harness assembly of the single drive duel
magneto was separated from the magneto. Closer
examination revealed significant fretting signatures
where the cap is seated against the housing of the
magneto and was supposed to have been secured by
four screws. There were no screws observed or found.
There were no impact energy damage signatures on the
cap, magneto, ignition harness, or firewall. The
pilot stated that he was the last person to have the
harness off the magneto.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
a loss of engine power while in cruise flight due to
an improperly installed magneto housing by the
owner/pilot.
= = =
Accident occurred Monday, June 28, 2004 in Perris,
CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 7/7/2005
Aircraft: SOCATA TB-20, registration: N110U
Injuries: 5 Uninjured.
The airplane collided with ground obstructions
during a forced landing following a catastrophic
engine failure due to oil exhaustion during cruise
flight. Just after achieving cruise altitude the
pilot was scanning the cockpit gauges and he noticed
the
oil pressure gauge indicating a loss of
pressure, with the oil warning light flickering
intermittently. About 5 minutes later, the engine
started to vibrate, and subsequently seized, making
a loud bang. The airplane began to descend about
1,000 feet per minute, and the pilot selected a dirt
field to perform an
emergency landing . During
the
landing roll, the airplane impacted a berm.
An engine examination revealed that the inside top
of the engine cowling showed a concentration of oil
near the firewall on the left side, which is the
approximate location of the vacuum pump. Removal of
the vacuum pump revealed an oily film on both sides
of the pump gasket, which is seated between the
vacuum pump flange and
the engine accessory case flange. The vacuum pump
had been installed about 0.5 hours prior to the
accident. The mechanic who installed the pump said
he used the gasket that was supplied with the pump.
The manufacturer of the vacuum pump reported that
they supply a gasket (part number AS3491-01) with
their pump. In the TB-20 parts manual, the airplane
manufacturer specifies that the gasket required is
part number Z00.N7423254013, which they
cross-reference with Textron Lycoming part number
8313. The investigation was unable to
cross-reference or establish an equivalency between
the AS3491-01 gasket supplied by the pump
manufacturer with either the Lycoming or Socata
specified gasket.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
A loss of engine power due to oil exhaustion as a
result of the mechanic's use of an incorrect gasket
during the installation of the vacuum pump.
= = =
Accident occurred Saturday, October 27, 2001 in
Perris, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 9/29/2004
Aircraft: Thomson Harmon Rocket II, registration:
N325L
Injuries: 2 Uninjured.
The amateur-built airplane nosed over during a
forced landing in a soft field following the partial
failure of the aileron and
elevator control system . The two pilots flew
the tandem seat airplane as part of the Phase 1
flight testing requirements following the completion
of the experimental airplane's manufacture. At the
conclusion of the flight test, the pilots noticed
that there was something wrong with the flight
controls when they went to return to their departure
airport. The pilots determined that they had no
aileron control and limited elevator control by use
of the electric trim, but maintained rudder control.
They elected to land in a field that would allow a
straight in approach. The approach and landing were
uneventful until the landing gear wheels dug into
the soft dirt, resulting in the airplane nosing
over. The FAA inspector, who examined the airplane
following the accident, reported that the bolt and
nut that connect the aileron and
elevator control tubes to the airframe were not in
place. The airplane accumulated 6.9 flight hours
since its manufacture and special airworthiness
certification issuance. The rear-seat pilot was the
airplane's builder.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
the airplane builder's failure to properly install a
bolt and nut into the aileron and elevator
flight
control system . A contributing factor was the
soft terrain conditions for the ensuing forced
landing.
Perris Valley
Airport Approach / Landing: