Watsonville Airport, Watsonville, CA
Location
: Watsonville is south east
of Santa Cruz.
History
:
Excerpts from Watsonville Airport History
- by author unknown
In the 1920's aircraft landed and took off from open
fields. Landing speeds were so slow that they did
not need runways. Thus names like Mines Fields
(now LAX), Mills Fields (now SFO), Buchanan Field
(Concord) came to be. Landing fields in our
area were found at such places as Rio Del Mar, San
Andreas, Palm Beach, one near Watsonville on Beach
Road. One called Storms Field, on what is now
called Freedom Blvd. near Mariposa Ave., was used by
many barnstormers to sell rides as they flew from
town to town.
It was early in 1931 that Watsonville entered the
aviation age. On May 9, 1931, Governor James
"Sunny Jim" Rolph

riding
a Stinson Monoplane piloted by W.W. Bendell made a low pass over the runway
and cut a ribbon stretched across the field to officially open Watsonville's
first airport.
This was just over a year after the formation of
"Watsonville Airport Inc.". Five thousand shares of stock were issued and
bought by 400 "largely civic minded citizens" to purchase land to build an
airport. An 85-acre site southwest of the city, near the junction of
Highway 1 and Salinas road in Monterey County, was chosen for the airport
because it was the only land available "at a reasonable price". It was to
become "the busy center of flying activity" until 1941 when it became a US
Navy facility. In 9141 the airport was designated as an auxiliary base out
of which the Navy would fly blimps to patrol for submarines off our coast.
The blimp flight squadrons and flight crew were based a Moffett Field and
Watsonville was an auxiliary field where a blimp and flight crew were
stationed. From there the blimps took off on 12-hour submarine patrols,
convoy escort flights, or on may occasions, to perform air-sea rescues.
They stationed the crews here for about a month before being rotated with
another crew and blimp....
...The Base was closed down in 1945 when the blimps
were no longer needed. The airport came to an end on May 3, 1947 when the
corporation sold it to Edwin and Flora Peterson for a cattle feed lot.
In 1939 the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA),
forerunner of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), decided that a
civil airport was needed in Santa Cruz County. CAA representatives went
first to the City of Santa Cruz offering to build an airport, if the city
would buy the land. This offer was conditioned with an agreement that upon
accepting CAA funding the land would always be used for an airport.
Surprisingly, they voted down the offer. The CAA presented the same offer
to the City of Watsonville. The offer was accepted by the City, and a
special election was held on May 12, 1942 with Proposition 4 being a bond
issue in the amount of $125,000 for a municipal airport. The citizens of
Watsonville passed Proposition 4 with 1547 for, 407 against and 27 votes
marked invalid.
In August of 1942 a parcel of land (287.58 acres)
was purchased near Freedom, the airports current site. It was reported that
the CAA had allocated $743,900 for construction of the airport.....
....The Navy took over in July, 1943, purchased an
additional 35 acres, built support buildings and the concrete ramp. On
October 23, 1943, the airport was commissioned as Naval Air Auxiliary
Station Watsonville (NAAS Watsonville) and served as a satellite to Naval
Air Station (NAS) Alameda.
With two auxiliary bases here, Watsonville became4
know as a "Navy Town". One will liked and remember45ed by the thousands of
Navy fliers who made their way to war zones..
There were as many as 75 combat aircraft and 1,200
men at a time stationed at the Air Station. Then the ramp was used for
Avengers, Corsairs, Dauntless', Hellcats and other Navy combat aircraft.
Today that same ramp provides ample space for corporate and private planes,
both local and visiting, which make daily use of the airport.
NAAs Watsonville was not a primar4y training
facility, but one where Carrier Air Groups (CAG) came to organize. Each CAG
consisted of torpedo, dive bomber and fighter squadrons. They brought these
together in Watsonville and stayed here 90 or 120 days to train together
before being assigned to the carriers on duty in the Pacific Theater of
Operations. Since ships were most vulnerable to submarine attack entering
and departing harbors, the CAGs would form on land and fly to the carrier
after the ship was well clear of the harbor and reverse the procedure when
returning to port.
Prior to the Navy taking over the airport in July ,
1943, the CAS had contributed approximately $744,000. The investment of the
City in the project, by virtue of the ownership of the 287.58 acres, was
approximately $280,000. By March of 1944, the Navy had invested an
additional $1.2 million.
As the war ended, so did operations at NAAS
Watsonville. On November 1, 1945 it was closed and placed on caretaker
status....
...On December 2, 1946, a Southwest Airways DC3
(later Northwest Orient) landed at Watsonville Airport to pick up its first
passenger and 16 pouches of mail, providing the first airline service to the
community. This service continued until 1956.
Special Events: Watsonville Airport is home to Day
in the Sky, an annual event which provides an opportunity for children with
disabilities to experience the freedom of flight. In 2008, about 175
children had the chance to soar above Santa Cruz County. The volunteer
pilots were members of the Watsonville chapter of the Experimental Aircraft
Association (EAA). Each volunteer was required to have logged at least 200
hours of flight time and pass a rigorous safety check form the EAA. This
event, in it's fourth year is coordinated by Shared Adventures, an
organization which offers recreational programs to people with special
needs.
Watsonville
Airport Today: Obstructions reported; Buildings; Power lines: Birds;
Intensive Flight training; Banner towing; Helicopter operations;

Airport
Services and Amenities: Abe's Aviation, LLC; Airmartronics Avionics
Division; Ocean Air Flight Services; Santa Cruz Flying Club; Stick and
Rudder Aviation; Straight and Level Aviation; Strawberry Aviation; United
Flight Services; Restaurant on the field; Zunigas; Lodging nearby;
Special Events and
Attractions: Golf; Beaches; Watsonville Flyin and Airshow Memorial
Weekend; Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk;
Airport
Area Accident History:Accident occurred Saturday, November 21, 2009 in
Watsonville, CA
Aircraft: BUDD JOHN B Lancair Legacy, registration: N7JX
Injuries: 1 Fatal.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors.
Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been
completed.
On November 21, 2009, about 1330 Pacific standard time, an experimental Budd
Lancair Legacy, N7JX, crashed in an apple orchard 1 mile east of Watsonville
Municipal Airport, California, after the pilot radioed a mayday call
reporting a loss of engine power. The pilot operated the airplane under the
provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The commercial
pilot was killed and the airplane was destroyed. Visual meteorological
conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed.
Northern California TRACON reported that at 1316, the pilot radioed a mayday
call on 121.5 MHz stating that he was at 5,500 feet, had an engine fire, and
had visual contact of the Watsonville Airport. No other communications were
reported. The aircraft wreckage was located soon afterwords, 1 mile east of
the Watsonville Airport in an apple orchard.
The engine has been recovered for examination.
= = =
= = =
Accident occurred Thursday, April 26, 2007 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 3/31/2008
Aircraft: Cessna 150L, registration: N1557Q
Injuries: 1 Minor, 1 Uninjured.
The airplane nosed over in a wheat field
following a loss of engine power during takeoff. The certified flight
instructor (CFI) estimated that 10 to 15 minutes elapsed between completion
of the run-up and takeoff checklist before traffic cleared so that he and
the student could take off. The takeoff was normal, and they started their
climb to the practice area. About 200 to 300 feet agl, the engine started to
lose power; it didn't just lose power. He took control. He applied
carburetor heat, and pumped the throttle a few times as he had done in the
past to keep an engine running. However, the engine didn't respond. The
airplane was over the end of the runway. He felt that they were too low to
turn around, and wanted to get the airplane down before they flew past the
clear area before a freeway. He aimed for a wheat field that he thought
would cushion the landing. He estimated that about 40 seconds elapsed from
the loss of power to touchdown. The wheat in the field was 4-feet tall, and
a lot thicker than the CFI expected. It stopped the airplane on touchdown,
causing a nose over. He saw fire in the engine compartment. He instructed
the student to be careful unstrapping since they were inverted, but to
hurry. They both exited out the right side door, and cleared the airplane.
The FAA coordinator examined the airplane and engine and no abnormalities
were found to preclude normal operation. The National Transportation Safety
Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: a
partial loss of engine power for undertermined reasons during takeoff. ===
Accident occurred Friday, September 15, 2006 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 1/31/2007
Aircraft: Grumman American AVN. CORP. AA-5,
registration: N6532L
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.
During cruise flight the engine lost power and
the airplane impacted several objects in a residential area about 2,000 feet
from the airport during an attempted forced landing. The flight was 310
nautical miles. The pilot said that during the preflight he visually checked
the fuel levels, which were near the top in both tanks. He calculated his
time en route based on a no-wind condition as 2.58 hours, with 38 gallons of
fuel and an 8-gallon per hour fuel burn. Prior to departure, he checked
weather, which showed that he would encounter 10- to 15-knot headwinds. He
reported that two of the flight's legs were longer than he had planned by a
total of 35 minutes. He had begun to worry about the airplane's fuel state
and had briefly considered a fuel stop short of his destination to refuel.
During the descent to his destination airport, the pilot switched the fuel
selector to the right fuel tank and the engine lost power. He switched to
the left tank, the engine started again, but then lost power. The pilot
attempted a forced landing at an uncontrolled airport, but the airplane did
not have sufficient altitude to make the runway, and it landed in a
residential area short of the airport. A deputy who responded to the
accident site noted that there was no smell of fuel around the airplane and
the left wing fuel tank was empty. The right wing had separated during the
accident sequence. The pilot stated that there were no mechanical anomalies
encountered with the airplane or engine. The National Transportation Safety
Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: A loss
of engine power due to fuel exhaustion as a result of the pilot's inadequate
preflight planning, en route fuel consumption calculations, and in-flight
decision to continue to the destination instead of stopping en route for
fuel. ===
Accident occurred Sunday, June 12, 2005 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 2/28/2006
Aircraft: Cessna 210, registration: N9457T
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
The airplane landed gear up. The pilot reported
that he put the gear handle in the down position as he was crossing over the
field to enter the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for runway 20. At
this time he noticed that the green landing gear annunciator light had
illuminated. Due to the high level of traffic in the pattern, the pilot did
not look into the mirrors to visually check if the landing gear had deployed
successfully like he usually does. During the landing flare, the airplane's
tail impacted the runway causing the airplane to bounce. The tail came down
and impacted the runway again. Shortly thereafter, the entire airplane spun
off the runway to the left onto the grass separating the taxiway and the
runway. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector examined the
airplane after the accident occurred. He stated that the main landing gear
doors were closed, and the main gear was in the fully retracted position.
The nose wheel had partially extended. The FAA inspector interviewed several
witnesses who heard the airplane's engine increase in power just prior to
the landing. According to the Cessna 210 Owners Manual, the landing gear and
doors operate in a specific sequence. Once the pilot places the gear
position handle out of the neutral position, the engine driven hydraulic
pump begins to create hydraulic pressure and transfers it to the hydraulic
actuators, which operate the landing gear doors and landing gear. When the
gear position handle is placed in the down position, the hydraulic pump
supplies pressure to the door's actuators first, allowing the doors to open.
Then, the hydraulic pressure will switch to the landing gear actuators, and
the gear will extend. Once the landing gear has completed the extension, the
hydraulic pressure will switch back to the door's actuators, and the doors
will close. When the doors have completely closed, the gear position handle
will return to the neutral position, completing the process. The National
Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this
accident as follows: the pilot's failure to extend the landing gear prior to
landing. ===
Accident occurred Monday, December 15, 2003 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 3/30/2005
Aircraft: Cessna 182P, registration: N1595M
Injuries: 2 Minor.
The airplane lost engine power shortly after
takeoff and collided with the ground as the pilot was attempting a return to
runway maneuver. The pilot said that the engine was running a little rough
on the first run up but it smoothed out on the second run up. He performed a
normal takeoff and climb. The engine was running smooth then quit suddenly
between 200 and 300 feet above ground level (agl). Because there were houses
directly beyond the end of the runway he entered an immediate left
descending 90-degree turn and leveled the wings before impacting the ground.
Post accident fluid samples were taken and water was found in the right main
fuel tank, gascolator, and carburetor bowl. The fuel filler cap o-rings were
hardened and cracked, and the fuel tank filler ports showed rust stains
around the interior perimeter of the port with rust corrosion on the
interior filler flanges. The airplane had been delivered to the airport by
the pilot in July for its annual inspection, and to be placed for sale. The
airplane remained tied down outside without significant flight activity
until the accident flight. Airworthiness Directive (AD) 83-12-01 was last
complied with in July 2002. AD 83-12-01 dictates that a placard stating
"CAUTION Leaking fuel caps can cause loss of fuel and erroneously high fuel
quantity indications" be placed adjacent to the fuel quantity gauges.
Additionally, it indicates that the fuel caps, seals, and filler ports
should be inspected for indications of improper sealing or leaking.
Examination of the cockpit revealed no such placards were present, adjacent
to the fuel quantity gauges, as required by AD-83-12-01. The National
Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this
accident as follows: a loss of engine power due to water contamination of
the fuel system and the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection. A
contributing factor was the pilot/owner's failure to comply with the
appropriate Airworthiness Directive. ===
Accident occurred Saturday, December 06, 2003 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 2/28/2006
Aircraft: Cessna 172S, registration: N396TA
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.
The airplane nosed over during a forced landing
in a muddy field following a total loss of engine power. The pilot was en
route to Monterey at 2,400 feet mean sea level (msl), in instrument
meteorological conditions, when the engine lost power and failed to restart
after three attempts. The pilot stated that he had 10 gallons of fuel in the
right and left fuel tanks. The airplane remained inverted in the field for a
period of time due to the muddy conditions that made access and recovery
very difficult. After recovery of the aircraft, 4 gallons of fuel was found
in the right tank and 1.75 gallons were in the left tank. The fuel selector
was positioned to the "Both" position and fuel was found in all components
of the fuel system. Examination of the engine revealed no condition that
would have prevented normal operation. The National Transportation Safety
Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: loss of
engine power for undetermined reasons. ===
Accident occurred Saturday, August 30, 2003 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 7/7/2005
Aircraft: Mooney M20C, registration: N707JH
Injuries: 3 Serious.
The airplane collided with trees and terrain
while the pilot was searching for the airport in instrument metrological
conditions (IMC). Prior to departure, the non-instrument rated pilot
programmed the flight's intended route into the moving map display of the
onboard global positioning system (GPS), as a means to navigate. After
passing over mountains located to the east of the airport, the pilot
observed the ground to be obscured by fog. The pilot continued further west,
maneuvering the airplane over Monterey bay and then circled back to the east
toward the airport. While en route, the pilot was searching for the lights
on the golf driving range, located about 1/2 mile west of the airport. He
was unable to see the lights, and the airplane impacted mountainous terrain,
coming to rest in an oak tree. Several minutes before the accident weather
reports indicated overcast ceilings of 300 feet above ground level with a
visibility of 7 miles. The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: the non-instrument rated
pilot's intentional continuance of VFR flight into instrument meteorological
conditions and failure to maintain clearance with terrain. ===
Accident occurred Friday, August 31, 2001 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 12/6/2002
Aircraft: Cessna T210M, registration: N6877M
Injuries: 1 Fatal.
The single engine airplane impacted terrain, 3
miles from the runway, while on final approach during hours of darkness. The
pilot was executing a localizer instrument landing approach and the reported
weather conditions at the airport were below minimums for the approach. The
pilot, who died 25 days after the accident, told early responders "I lost my
engine." A postcrash fire destroyed the cockpit area and inboard wings of
the airplane and a large area of surrounding vegetation. Fueling records and
a fuel consumption calculation showed that the airplane should have had
sufficient fuel on board for about 3 hours more flying. The engine was
peripherally involved in the fire and was subsequently run on an engine
stand satisfactorily. The National Transportation Safety Board determines
the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: The loss of engine power
for undetermined reasons. ===
Accident occurred Friday, August 18, 2000 in
WATSONVILLE, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 3/30/2004
Aircraft: Robinson R22 BETA, registration:
N8313Z
Injuries: 2 Fatal.
The flight instructor was cruising or
maneuvering the helicopter during an introductory flight with a new student.
Witnesses in the area reported observing the helicopter in what appeared to
be normal flight, heard a loud bang, and then saw the helicopter abruptly
pitch nose down while the main rotor blades separated from the helicopter.
One of the witnesses observed the helicopter turn and climb moments before
the accident sequence initiated; two of the witnesses reported that just
prior to the accident the helicopter was flying in level cruise flight. At
the time of the accident, the sky was clear, the visibility was at least 10
miles, a light breeze existed, and no other aircraft were flying in the
immediate area. The on-scene examination of the accident site revealed
Plexiglas fragments and left door components about 400 feet from where the
main wreckage fell into an open dirt field. Additional items, including
sunglasses, a left skid tube-mounted component and the main rotor blade
assembly, were found 140 to 330 feet from the main wreckage. An examination
of the rotor hub revealed the teetering stops were cracked and both of the
rotor blade spindles had broken their respective (droop stop) tusks. The
physical evidence indicates the main rotor diverged from its normal plane of
rotation, resulting in mast bumping, main rotor blade contact with the
fuselage, and separation of the main rotor assembly. No evidence of any
preimpact mechanical malfunction was found with the helicopter. The
initiating event that produced the main rotor divergence could not be
determined.
The National Transportation Safety Board
determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: The divergence
of the main rotor from its normal plane of rotation for an undetermined
reason, which resulted in mast bumping and rotor contact with the fuselage.
===
Accident occurred Sunday, July 09, 2000 in
Watsonville, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 11/25/2003
Aircraft: Interavia E-3, registration: N4426X
Injuries: 1 Minor.
The private pilot was flying his experimental
single engine airplane after performing maintenance, when the engine lost
power after 40 minutes of operation. According to the pilot's written
statement, he "checked and measured" the gas in the fuel tanks after
performing maintenance on the airplane. He calculated that he had 20 gallons
of fuel on board, or 40 minutes of endurance at 100 percent power or 1 hour
of endurance at 70 percent power. He started the engine at 1450 and departed
at 1500. He reported that he set the power at 70 percent for the flight. The
engine quit as the pilot was turning back toward the airport. He checked the
fuel gauges and reported that they indicated 5 gallons in each fuel tank. He
pumped the fuel pump and the engine started, ran for approximately 30
seconds, and lost power again. The pilot reported that he could not restart
the engine. He elected to land in a cow pasture on the side of mountainous
terrain. While attempting to land over a fence and trees, the left wing
touched down, slewing the plane off course. The left main landing gear
separated from the left wing and the wing sustained structural damage. In
his statement, the pilot noted that he should have operated the airplane by
fuel time, not the gauges. The National Transportation Safety Board
determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: the total loss
of engine power due to the pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculations,
which resulted in fuel exhaustion. ===
Airport Approach /
Landing: